
Is Mitt Romney a “natural born citizen”?
It is absolutely clear that Mitt Romney is NOT a Natural Born Citizen unless he can prove that George Romney gained citizenship from naturalization prior to Mitt’s birth in 1947.
Having the Status of Birthright Citizenship Is Not Sufficient to Make One an
Article II “Natural Born citizen”
Mitt Romney / Not Eligable to hold the office of {POTUS}.
Call upon Mitt Romney now to either post Gaskell Romney’s US naturaliztion documents (or repatriated record) or George Romney‘s US naturaliztion documents that he would have filled out and signed when he was 21 years of age, or withdraw from the presidential race as Constitutionally unqualified to take the oath of office of the presidency of the United States.
Was George Romney (father of Mitt Romney) a U.S. citizen?
Not according to the historical records.
b. Colonia Dublán, Galeana, Chihuahua, México, 8 July 1907, d. Bloomfield Hills, Mich., 26 July 1995 [SSDI 577-10-6742], bur. Fairview Cemetery, Brighton, Mich.
m. Salt Lake City, Utah, 2 July 1931.
George Romney was born in Mexico to expatriated Mormon parents. George’s father is named Gaskell Romney.
If George Romney was not a “U.S. citizen” or became naturalized BEFORE Mitt was born, then neither can Mitt Romeny (his son) be natural born.

What amazes me most is even those I consider intelligent can read the quotes from Congress and SCOTUS rulings etc. and still will argue with what those words mean.
Folks it honestly is not ROCKET SCIENCE.
It is simply fact … read the quotes for yourself.
Just because no one in politics or the media is dealing with any of this?
None of that ALTERS THE FACTS OR CHANGES what our founders defined this term to mean.
HERE THEY ARE AGAIN United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898):
“At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of PARENTS who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.
These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
This is straight forward FACT.
To be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN … you must be born in the country and your parents must BOTH BE CITIZENS.
BOTH REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET!
PARENTS can be born citizens or naturalized
(naturalized at the time of the child’s birth).
If both requirements are not met the child can still be a “US citizen” just not “natural born”.
No matter how anyone slices, dices or ginsus it Barack Obama has painted himself in a corner with his released Birth Certificate (be it real or fraud).
His father NEVER WAS A US CITIZEN.
For sure he does not meet the “natural born” requirement.
His US citizenship is iffy should his Hawaiian BC turn out to be a fraud.
Now to further hammer nails into the coffin lid of the Constitution comes Mitt Romney.
Here is further information just sent my way on his parentage and their citizenship.
Let me say this again … my research SHOWS NO REPATRIATION OR NATURALIZATION of George Romney.
That does not mean there is none … it does however cast serious problems into the cogs of what appears to be a well oiled Mitt Romney campaign for President machine.
I thank Edward Noonan for allowing me to republish this information.
MITT ROMNEY IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!
The big question is this…how did George and Gaskell Romney get their US Citizenship back if they ever had it at all?
If Gaskell (son) and Miles Park Romney (father) who were both Mexican citizens how could they transfer US Citizenship to George Romney?
Mitt Romney, however, may be a birthright baby because he fell under the 14th Amendment (I doubt they were under the jurisdiction of the US) but it is absolutely clear that Mitt Romney is NOT a Natural Born Citizen unless he can prove that George Romney gained citizenship from naturalization prior to Mitt’s birth in 1947. I have found no records showing this to be the case.
Edward C. Noonan
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/01/28/mitt-romneys-father-was-a-mexican-citizen-when-mitt-was-born/
With the Republican Party it is also about them wanting to run their choice non natural born Citizens too … like Rubio, Jindal, and McCain who they ran last time.
Both political parties have been trying to abrogate Article II Section 1, the presidential eligibility clause in congressional attempts for over 10 years preceding the 2008 election cycle.
Not being able to get anywhere with amending the constitution, they simply chose to ignore it with the help of an enabling media in 2008.
Read my essay on The Perfect Storm – The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election — the 3rd link in my blog post at:
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2011/09/24/even-republicans-rejected-info-about-obamas-past-by-john-drew-americanthinker-com/
CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org

0 comments:
Post a Comment